WHO ARE THE DELAWARE PLAINTIFFS?

Organizational Plaintiffs

ORGANIZATIONAL Representatives

Theo Braddy

National Council on Independent Living (NCIL)

Jody Hougentogler

The Freedom Center for Independent Living, Inc. ​

Steve Lieberman

United Spinal

Ian McIntosh

Not Dead Yet

Daniese McMullin-Powell

ADAPT Delaware

Matt Vallière

Institute for Patients’ Rights

Individual Plaintiffs

Sean Curran

Disability Advocate

WHO ARE THE LAWYERS?​

Rosen Bien Galvan & Grunfeld LLP logo
Halloran, Farkas, & Kittila LLP

Theodore A. Kittila

Rosen Bien Galvan & Grunfeld LLP

Michael Bien

Ernest Galvan

Van Swearingen

Kara Janssen

Media Requests

Click below for our media spokespersons and contact information.

LEGAL DOCUMENTS

Opening Brief

This is the plaintiffs initial brief. It argues that Delaware’s assisted suicide law unfairly targets people with disabilities by labeling them “terminal” and giving them access to death instead of support. It says the court wrongly dismissed the case and ignored real harm, discrimination, and serious legal concerns.

Order Denying Group the Right to Intervene

When we filed our lawsuit, Compassion & Choices (a pro-assisted suicide organization) filed a request to join the case as additional participants. The court denied this request. This means the original parties remain the only ones involved, and the case will move forward without the intervenors.

Appeal of Dismissal

We are appealing the dismissal of our lawsuit challenging Delaware’s assisted-suicide law. We argue the district court was wrong to dismiss the case because we do have standing: the law already discriminates against people with disabilities by labeling us as eligible for assisted suicide and treating us differently from others. We also contend the law is overly broad and poorly written, potentially applying to more people than intended. Our organizations are harmed as well, because we must divert resources to support affected members. Finally, we argue the court improperly dismissed the case and denied a temporary restraining order without fully considering the evidence, and we ask the appeals court to reverse and allow our case to move forward.

Amicus Briefs

Amicus briefs are when organizations or experts who are not part of a court case share their perspective to help the judges understand the issue better before making a decision. The groups below have all submitted powerful briefs in support of our lawsuits.

Eat, Breathe, Thrive

Disability Organizations

Physicians

Alliance Defending Freedom

Scroll to Top